Ya‘arot devash (Honeycombs)

Jonathan Eybeschütz

1744

Sermon of Ethical Rebuke Preached . . . between New Year’s Day and the Day of Atonement, 5505 [1744] to the Congregation of Metz

Introspection All Year Round

But when we live in houses of hewn stone and solid materials, then the stones of our houses testify against us, telling us that we are causing affliction in the house, making it a house of robbery and haughtiness and lust and desire, where the demon Lilith nests and finds a home, and she sends out her arrows in various directions. This is especially true for those who build houses without justice and encroach on the boundaries of the poor—about such people, it is said that their houses are their graves. Consider how the glorious divine presence dwelt in a tent, the mishkan, made of planks and curtains, and lasted this way in the wilderness and also in the Land, for it moved from tent to tent, from the wilderness to Gilgal to Shiloh to Nob to Gibeon, and lasted 480 years. On the other hand, Solomon’s Temple, which was built of precious stones, lasted only 410 years, and ended up as a fiery ruin, due to our great sins. Then there was the Second Temple, which was destroyed multiple times over the Greek era; even though Herod rebuilt it, it nonetheless lasted a grand total of only 420 years.

The verse alludes to all this in its wording: In sukkot shall ye dwell for seven days (Leviticus 23:42)—this is the general rule for everyone, which is sufficient to fulfill the law of the holiday. But every ezraḥ, that is, the saintly people of the Israelites, who are called ezraḥim after Abraham, who was called the Ezraḥite, who came from the other side of the river—these people should dwell in sukkot always, without taking any break or time off, for they should always dwell in sukkot, and never stop: that is, they should consider the entire universe a temporary dwelling, as we have said; for it is so good for us to do so. Moreover, the sukkah alludes to the idea of Torah, for just as the sukkah is the shade of faith [tsela de-mehemanut], so is the Torah the shade of faith. And this is why Solomon exclaimed: I have desired and dwelt in His shade (Song of Songs 2:3)—this is the shade of Torah and the shade of the sukkah.

Concern for the Holiness of the Sukkah

And therefore, one should sit and study Torah in the sukkah, and not have a big party where men and women, young and old, and brides and grooms mix together for obscene and cynical conversations, and lustful thoughts—woe to the ears that hear such things and the eyes that see them, for they take the shade of the sukkah, the shade of faith, and turn it into an evil shade, the shade of demons and destructive angels, goat-demons prance around in it, and it is a corrupt sukkah, through which one cannot fulfill the precept! For the sukkah is meant to have the Lord’s cloud upon it—and although it is not visible, it is nonetheless clear and true that whoever sit in the sukkah for its proper purpose, and study the Torah, and rejoice in the festival and its precepts, and the in the joy of the festivals, then the Lord’s cloud hovers over it; any eye that sees this can confirm it. But one who spends one’s time in the sukkah in mockery and sin and iniquity removes the cloud, and it turns into the morning clouds of inanity from the side of evil (sitra aḥra); and about this it is said: the cloud is gone and departed (Job 7:9). But the main point of the sukkah is Torah.

Translated by
Gabriel
Wasserman
.

Other works by Eybeschütz: Bene ahuvah on Mishneh Torah (ca. 1714–ca. 1764); Berakhot (1728); Luḥot ‘edut (1755); Kereti u-peleti (1765); Tif’eret Yisra’el (1773); Urim ve-tumim (1775); Binah la-‘itim (1796).

Credits

Jonathan Eybeschütz, “Sermon of Ethical Rebuke Preached . . . between New Year’s Day and the Day of Atonement, 5505 [1744], to the Congregation of Metz: The Meaning of the Sukkah: Exile, for the Whole World Is Only a Temporary Dwelling” (sermon, Metz, 1744). Published in: Jonathan Eybeschuetz, Sefer Yaʻarot devash (Honeycombs), vol. 1 (Yozifov: Bi-defus Shlomah Vahin, 1865), pp. 39–42 (41v–42r).

Published in: The Posen Library of Jewish Culture and Civilization, vol. 5.

Engage with this Source

You may also like