Commentary on al-Fāsī: On the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbat

The next year they established them [i.e., the days of Hanukkah] as eight festive days. [b. Shabbat 21b]

All eight days were included, as no such miracle had ever been wrought for Israel, for even though Pharaoh did not decree against the observance of the commandments, the evil Greeks did so decree. Therefore, they extended these days to match the length of the festival of Sukkot, which is eight days, to remember the miracle on them [i.e., each of the eight days].

Even if the miracle of the oil had not occurred for them, they would still have rejoiced and commemorated the miraculous events for a period equivalent to the longest of all the festivals. However, they would not have lit lights at all; rather, they would have praised and exalted God as on the other festivals. When they received the further miracle of the oil, they added that one should light lights, to commemorate the double miracle.

The Jerusalem Talmud explains that, as the people were located four days’ distance from the place where the oil was prepared, they were unable to bring enough good oil to Jerusalem within eight days. During these eight days that the miracle transpired, they sent messengers there and brought a large quantity of oil for them from olives that had been picked after the overbearing Greeks were defeated.

Translated by Avi Steinhart.

Published in: The Posen Library of Jewish Culture and Civilization, vol. 3: Encountering Christianity and Islam.

Engage with this Source

In this brief comment on al-Fāsī’s talmudic digest, Jonathan ha-Kohen of Lunel discusses the length of Hanukkah. Why should Hanukkah, a postbiblical festival, be eight days long, which is as long as the longest biblical festival? His answer to this question echoes ideas found in 2 Maccabees, a book omitted from the rabbinic version of the biblical canon but which circulated among Provençal Jews. Like other interpreters, Jonathan notes two Hanukkah miracles, the military victory and the miracle of the oil, the latter of which is recorded only in the Babylonian Talmud. Jonathan’s commentary on al-Fāsī was one of many such texts written in the medieval period, testifying to the ongoing importance of al-Fāsī’s work and to its frequent role as a replacement for the more involved Babylonian Talmud.

Read more

You may also like