Pharisees and Sadducees on Resurrection

When called before the Sanhedrin, allegedly on the charge of teaching contrary to Jewish law and for defiling the Temple, Paul identifies himself as “a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees.” He causes dissension in the crowd by raising the issue of resurrection of the dead, as Sadducees deny resurrection, whereas the Pharisees believe in it. The argument becomes so violent that the Roman tribune removes Paul from the tribunal to protect him from bodily harm. For more Jewish writings on this topic, see Resurrection.

Engage with this Source

When called before the Sanhedrin, allegedly on the charge of teaching contrary to Jewish law and for defiling the Temple, Paul identifies himself as “a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees.” He causes dissension in the crowd by raising the issue of resurrection of the dead, as Sadducees deny resurrection, whereas the Pharisees believe in it. The argument becomes so violent that the Roman tribune removes Paul from the tribunal to protect him from bodily harm. For more Jewish writings on this topic, see Resurrection.

Read more

You may also like