Marriage to Sadducean Women

m. Niddah 4:2

70–220

About This Entry

This mishnah addresses the question of whether it is permissible to marry Sadducean women. The two opinions expressed both permit marriage to a Sadducean woman as long as she does not cling to her father’s Sadducean beliefs. The difference of opinion preserved in this mishnah is whether, in order to be marriageable, a woman of Sadducean descent must affirmatively disavow the beliefs of the Sadducees or whether she merely must not affirmatively adopt them. In either case, there is a strong hesitation to classify Sadducees categorically as forbidden “Others” (see REAL AND IMAGINED “OTHERS”).

The daughters of the Sadducees, so long as they are accustomed to walking in the paths of their fathers, are to be regarded as Samaritan women [i.e., as nonpracticing Jews]. If they left those paths to walk in the paths of Israel, they are to be regarded as Israelite women. R. Yosi says: They are always regarded as Israelite women unless they leave the paths of Israel to walk in the paths of their fathers.

Adapted from the translation of Joshua Kulp.

Credits

m. Niddah 4:2, adapted from Mishnah Yomit, trans. Joshua Kulp, www.sefaria.org. Originally from https://learn.conservativeyeshiva.org. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License.

Published in: The Posen Library of Jewish Culture and Civilization, vol. 2: Emerging Judaism.

Engage with this Source

This mishnah addresses the question of whether it is permissible to marry Sadducean women. The two opinions expressed both permit marriage to a Sadducean woman as long as she does not cling to her father’s Sadducean beliefs. The difference of opinion preserved in this mishnah is whether, in order to be marriageable, a woman of Sadducean descent must affirmatively disavow the beliefs of the Sadducees or whether she merely must not affirmatively adopt them. In either case, there is a strong hesitation to classify Sadducees categorically as forbidden “Others” (see REAL AND IMAGINED “OTHERS”).

Read more
Restricted
Some content is unavailable to non-members, please log in or sign up for free for full access.

Related Guide

Legal Tension between Pharisees and Sadducees

1st Century BCE–1st Century CE
Restricted
Some content is unavailable to non-members, please log in or sign up for free for full access.

Related Guide

Jewish Identity and Sectarianism

1st Century BCE–1st Century CE

You may also like

Pharisees and Sadducees Debate Halakhah

m. Yadayim 4:5–8
5. The Aramaic sections in Ezra and Daniel defile the hands. An Aramaic section written in Hebrew, or a Hebrew section written in Aramaic, or [Hebrew written in] Hebrew script does not defile the…
View Source

Purification at Sunset

m. Parah 3:7

The elders of Israel used to go first by foot to the Mount of Olives, where there was a place of immersion. The priest that was to burn the cow was [deliberately] made unclean on account of the…
View Source

Pharisees and Ritual Purity

m. Ḥagigah 2:7
The garments of an ‘am ha’arets [a common person] possess midras-impurity for Pharisees. The garments of Pharisees possess midras-impurity for those who eat terumah [gifts for…
View Source

Sadducee Rejection of the Law of Eruv

m. Eruvin 6:1–2
1. One who lives in a courtyard with a non-Jew or with one who does not acknowledge the [principle of] eruv, that [person] restricts him [from making use of the eruv]—the words of R. Meir. R. Eliezer…
View Source

Punishment of False Witnesses

m. Makkot 1:6
Perjuring witnesses are not to be put to death until [after] the end of the trial. Because the Sadducees say: [Perjurers were put to death] only after the accused had [actually] been executed, as it…
View Source