The Cluster of Henna: On Exegesis
I have approached this to scrutinize, search, and gather them into Eshkōl ha-kōfer, so that it be for us my witness and a crown, as a sachet of myrrh (Song of Songs 1:13), so that we not be a disgrace or a shame. According to God’s gracious hand upon me, I added more than I found in a book. I am recounting them according to the exactitude of the…
These passages from The Cluster of Henna address the question of how, methodologically, Jews should interpret scripture. Exegetical principles can be found in rabbinic literature, but medieval Jewish scholars attempted to reflect systematically on scriptural hermeneutics, especially in the context of religious polemic. Scriptural interpretation became one of the touchstones of Rabbanite-Karaite debate. Karaites frequently incorporated at least some of the rabbinic methods found in midrash, to which they added other approaches they deemed reasonable, as Judah Hadassi does here, giving the fifteenth and thirtieth methods (out of eighty) of biblical interpretation. His application of logic to scriptural exegesis reflects developments of earlier generations of Jewish and non-Jewish thinking.
Related Guide
Early Medieval Bible Translations and Commentaries
You may also like
Commentary: On Ecclesiastes
Commentary on Ecclesiastes 7:10, 12:9
Commentary: On Ezekiel
On Ezekiel 1:1, 4, 20:21-26
Commentary: On Amos
On Amos 3:12
On the First Rashi in the Torah
On Genesis 1:1
Commentary: On Genesis
On Genesis 44:18
Commentary: On Proverbs
On Proverbs 12:9