Commentary: On Amos

And so shall the Israelites be saved, who dwell in Samaria (Amos 3:12) complacent and secure and lying on ivory beds with [only] an edge of a bed and lolling upon their couches (Amos 6:4) with [only] a head/leg of a couch. And nothing shall be saved except for these least parts. And out of all their wealth and all of their pleasure-goods, they shall save nothing except for the edge of a long bed and two legs. And similarly with regard to the head/leg of a couch, since both a bed and a couch are each types of beds, and according to their differentiation in construct and purpose, what [Scripture] calls with regard to bed—edge, it calls with regard to couch—head/leg. You are compelled [to interpret] that since bed and couch are parallel to one another, and since edge is juxtaposed to bed, and head/leg is juxtaposed to couch, that their juxtaposition and their parallelism testify to their meaning. And you have no rule in [interpreting] Torah greater than “a matter learned from its context.” And the prophet saw this in that he rebukes the inhabitants of Samaria about their palaces and their beds and their couches, and that is the language that he chooses here. And [the phrase] the edge of a bed . . . harkens back to [so shall the Israelites] be saved.

Translated by Robert A. Harris.

Notes

Words in brackets appear in the original translation.

Credits

Eliezer of Beaugency, Commentary: On Amos, trans. Robert A. Harris, from Robert A. Harris, Rabbi Eliezer of Beaugency: Commentaries on Amos and Jonah (with Selections from Isaiah and Ezekiel), TEAMS Commentary Series (Kalamazoo, Mich.: Medieval Institute Publications, 2017), 30–32. Used with permission of the publisher.

Published in: The Posen Library of Jewish Culture and Civilization, vol. 3: Encountering Christianity and Islam.

Engage with this Source

In this comment on Amos 3:12 (“Thus says the Lord: As the shepherd takes out of the mouth of the lion two legs, or a piece of an ear, so shall the Israelites be saved that dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed and in Damascus [dameshek] in a couch”), Eliezer enunciates an exegetical principle crucial to his biblical commentaries, namely, that contextualized interpretation is the most important guide for understanding scriptural ambiguities. To this end, Eliezer cites a traditional rabbinic principle of interpretation: “a matter is learned from its context,” which refers to understanding difficult terminology by looking at the biblical context. In this short excerpt, Eliezer interprets the cryptic term dameshek, which others understand to denote the Syrian city of Damascus, as part of a bed, either the head or the leg. Eliezer’s attitude places him at the center of peshat (plain meaning) exegesis in his period.

Read more

You may also like