Commentary: On Genesis 1:1

Rashbam’s commentary, written in Hebrew, understood both legal and nonlegal passages according to the peshat (plain meaning) approach, which often led him to reach conclusions that were at odds with accepted rabbinic interpretations. For this reason, Rashbam asserted that his analyses should not override those of the rabbis. Samuel inaugurated a tradition of northern European interest in this style of interpretation, but his own commentary survived to the modern period only in a single manuscript.

Engage with this Source

Rashbam’s commentary, written in Hebrew, understood both legal and nonlegal passages according to the peshat (plain meaning) approach, which often led him to reach conclusions that were at odds with accepted rabbinic interpretations. For this reason, Rashbam asserted that his analyses should not override those of the rabbis. Samuel inaugurated a tradition of northern European interest in this style of interpretation, but his own commentary survived to the modern period only in a single manuscript.

Read more

You may also like