Letter to Aaron ha-Ḥazan ben Ephraim

[From:] The son of the exilarch.

The news reached us—our splendorous one, my dear ḥazan, R. Aaron, may God support you—concerning what the person known as Ibn Shā’ūl and his son did, undertaking ritual slaughter that went against established law. They transgressed time after time; even though they were exhorted and warned, these warnings did not concern them. So, we went forth and pronounced a ḥerem [ban] against anyone who speaks with them or does business with them or goes out to the bathhouse with them or gets within four cubits of them. It is necessary to promulgate this ban and to inform the Jewish community—may God defend it—to apply assiduously the excommunication according to the manner described, until [father and son] repent.

Salvation.

Source: JTS ENA 4009.11.

Translated by Brendan G. Goldman.

Published in: The Posen Library of Jewish Culture and Civilization, vol. 3: Encountering Christianity and Islam.

Engage with this Source

In this short letter, the controversial leader David ben Daniel charges Aaron ben Ephraim, a ḥazan (a synagogue functionary), with enforcing a ban of excommunication against an individual who had repeatedly violated the regulations surrounding the kosher slaughter of animals. It was not uncommon for communal leaders to enforce rules about the preparation of meat; in fact, the Muslim convert from Judaism and anti-Jewish polemicist Samaw’al al-Maghribī (d. 1175) attacked Jewish leaders whom he saw as flaunting their leadership by imposing stringencies on meat production. While there is insufficient evidence to impugn Daniel’s motives here, meat production was certainly politicized in the early medieval period and beyond. There is no way to know if Aaron acted upon David’s instructions.

Read more

You may also like